[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"article-detail":3},{"article":4,"alternate":33,"related":38,"latest":47},{"orderNumber":5,"showImage":6,"title":7,"metaDescription":8,"content":9,"metaKeywords":10,"withAllowSearch":11,"modified":12,"viewCount":13,"id":14,"lang":15,"slug":16,"thumbnail":6,"withHot":17,"withLeadNews":17,"author":18,"created":19,"withTop":17,"highlightContent":20,"userId":21,"highlightTitle":7,"commentStatus":11,"commentCount":5,"thumbnailToContent":11,"withRecommend":17,"metaTitle":22,"editMode":23,"siteId":5,"user":24,"authorEn":18,"status":31,"categoryId":32,"summary":26},0,"\u002Fattachment\u002F20261007\u002F395844b7fc704f5f95cbe57624a72fb3.webp","AI Consumer Spending: Who Actually Pays for AI?","Only 1% of AI subscribers generate nearly a fifth of consumer AI revenue. Here's what a16z's spending data reveals about who really pays for AI.","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Recently, the well-known venture firm a16z released the seventh edition of its \u003Ci>Top 100 Consumer AI Apps\u003C\u002Fi> list. After three years of tracking, this traffic-based ranking has thoroughly solidified: this edition welcomed only 11 new products — a historic low.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">But something more significant than the ranking itself: for the first time, a16z paired the list with real US consumer credit-card spending data.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">When \"who uses\" and \"who pays\" are overlaid, an uncomfortable truth emerges: AI's traffic empire is held up by a very small number of people paying real money.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">And those people are probably not visible in your social feed.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>The Power-Law Reality of AI Spending\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Survey data shows nearly half of US adults say they have used an AI product. But only 25% open one every day.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">As of August 2026, consumers paying for ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude subscriptions: just 4.5% — double the figure from a year earlier, yet still vanishingly small.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Roughly speaking, of every 100 Americans who have tried AI, only about 9 are willing to pay for it long-term.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">More users are calling AI from inside desktop apps and traditional software, but those behaviors never enter web-traffic statistics. The traffic ranking shows only the tip of the iceberg; the spending data reveals the worrying part under the waterline.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">So who is actually keeping this industry alive?\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"table\">\n \u003Ctable style=\"border-collapse:collapse;color:#333;font-size:14px;margin:18px 0;max-width:680px;width:100%;\">\n  \u003Ctbody>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"background-color:#f7f7f7;border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;text-align:left;\">Metric (US consumer AI market, 2026)\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"background-color:#f7f7f7;border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;text-align:left;\">Value\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Adults who say they have used an AI product\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Nearly half (≈50%)\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Who open an AI product every day\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Only 25% of users\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Consumers paying for ChatGPT \u002F Gemini \u002F Claude (Aug 2026)\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">4.5% (roughly doubled in a year)\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Top 1% of paying users — share of revenue\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">19.5% (more than the bottom 50% combined)\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Top power users — monthly spend\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">≈$903\u002Fmonth (up 80% in 18 months)\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Median subscriber — monthly spend\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">≈$25\u002Fmonth (barely growing)\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Gap between power users and the median\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">≈36x\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n  \u003C\u002Ftbody>\n \u003C\u002Ftable>\n\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">a16z's data shows an extreme power-law distribution: the top 1% of paying users contribute 19.5% of consumer-AI revenue — more than the bottom 50% of users combined.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">These pyramid-top users spend about $903 per month on AI tools — roughly ¥6,054 at recent exchange rates, about a month's salary for some people. Their spending has surged 80% over the past 18 months. The median paying user spends about $25 a month (≈¥167), a figure that has barely grown.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">The gap: about 36x.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>What Power Users Actually Buy\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">The shopping lists of these super-users are revealing: on one side, automation tools like n8n and Manus; on the other, creative-production platforms like Higgsfield, Figma, and HeyGen. Every tool shares one trait — they are all tools for getting work done.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">They pay for AI not for casual chat or novelty, but as productivity components genuinely embedded in their workflows.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">That is consumer AI's first \"real market\": the people willing to pay are precisely those who use AI to make or save money.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">There is another telling pattern: among the top 50 AI vendors by real spending, 29 never appear on the traffic list at all. You may never have heard of them, yet a small cluster of heavy users keeps paying. Their users don't chase \"download counts\"; they only care whether the tool gets the job done.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Conversely, only seven companies appear on all three lists — web traffic, mobile MAU, and real revenue:\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"table\">\n \u003Ctable style=\"border-collapse:collapse;color:#333;font-size:14px;margin:18px 0;max-width:640px;width:100%;\">\n  \u003Ctbody>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"background-color:#f7f7f7;border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;text-align:left;\">Only companies on all three lists (web traffic, mobile MAU, real revenue)\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd> \u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">ChatGPT\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd> \u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Claude\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd> \u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Suno\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd> \u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Perplexity\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd> \u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Photoroom\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd> \u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Canva\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd> \u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Notion\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd> \u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">High-revenue AI vendors absent from the traffic list\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Ctd style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">29 of the top 50 by real spend\u003C\u002Ftd>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n  \u003C\u002Ftbody>\n \u003C\u002Ftable>\n\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Most star products inflated by free traffic never make it to the table of real spending.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>ChatGPT vs Claude: Two Strategies\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">The mass-market landscape is quietly shifting too.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">ChatGPT remains the absolute traffic king: its mobile MAU is 14x Claude's, and its paid-subscriber count is 3x higher than Gemini's and Claude's combined.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">But the real variable is Claude. In the first edition of the list (September 2023), Claude did not appear at all. Today it has not only surged in traffic but briefly overtaken Gemini in total US paying users.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">The key is subscription structure: about 7.5% of Claude's subscribers buy premium plans at $100\u002Fmonth or more, while for ChatGPT and Gemini that share is only about 1%.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Claude follows a \"refinement\" strategy: it does not chase the most users; it chases the users most willing to pay. In the subscription game, that is often the smartest play.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>Paying Is Easy, Staying Is Hard\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Almost every leading AI company shares a contradictory pattern.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">RevenueCat's 2026 subscription report shows AI apps convert trials to paid at 8.5% — 52% higher than non-AI apps — and their paid users' lifetime value leads traditional apps by a wide margin.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">But retention is terrible: AI apps' annual retention is just 21.1%, versus 30.7% for non-AI apps. Users cancel annual subscriptions about 30% faster than with traditional apps.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">In plain terms: AI products are first-rate at making people pay, and poor at making them stay.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">The logic is easy to follow: users are attracted by a new feature, pay, discover after a while that it's just okay — or find a cheaper alternative — and cancel. The AI app market is still in its \"trial period\": users hop between products hunting for the newest, strongest tool.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Most AI products have not yet made users feel they can't live without them.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>The Hidden Cost of \"Free\"\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">The free lunch has always carried a price.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">A survey of college students makes the point: 45% think the free tier is good enough; 30% would pay only in specific scenarios like exam weeks or thesis season; about 70% would not pay immediately. Their core needs — paper summarization, research search, thesis outlines — are largely covered by free tiers.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">So what actually stops them from paying? 40% say paying and then still hitting usage limits is the most frustrating; 25% worry about privacy, especially granting browser access or letting the app read files.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">This exposes the deeper problem of the free model: users are not unwilling to pay for good products; they don't believe that paying will actually solve the problem.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">In fact, free users' hidden costs are far larger than they realize. ChatGPT's free tier gives half the context window of subscribers, ads are on by default, and conversations are used for model training by default.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Gemini goes further: from October 9, 2026, free users will only get the lowest-performance Flash-Lite model — Flash and Pro are removed from the free tier.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Free users \"pay\" for AI in convenience and experience — and most don't know what they are paying.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"table\">\n \u003Ctable style=\"border-collapse:collapse;color:#333;font-size:14px;margin:18px 0;max-width:680px;width:100%;\">\n  \u003Ctbody>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"background-color:#f7f7f7;border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;text-align:left;\">Group\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"background-color:#f7f7f7;border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;text-align:left;\">Behavior\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"background-color:#f7f7f7;border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;text-align:left;\">AI is…\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Power users (top 1%)\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Buy automation and creative tools embedded in real workflows; replace outsourcing teams\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">An investment, not a purchase (≈$903\u002Fmonth)\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Median subscribers\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Pay for one or two tools; neither deep in productivity nor free\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">A modest subscription (≈$25\u002Fmonth)\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n   \u003Ctr>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Free believers\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Trade data for convenience, attention for service; free tiers shrink over time\u003C\u002Fth>\n    \u003Cth style=\"border:1px solid #ddd;padding:9px 10px;\">Being commoditized — if you do not pay, you are the product\u003C\u002Fth>\n   \u003C\u002Ftr>\n  \u003C\u002Ftbody>\n \u003C\u002Ftable>\n\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>The Real Debate: Subscriptions or Ads?\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">a16z's report also reveals a key metric: on the web, about 85% of AI product revenue comes from subscriptions, with only 13–14% from advertising.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">That means consumer AI earns almost everything by charging users directly.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">This logic is completely different from the previous internet era, when search, social, and e-commerce monetized users indirectly: users free, advertisers pay.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">a16z investing partner Olivia Moore has raised a pointed question: subscription may fundamentally be a business model that cannot reach the mass market.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Her reasoning is compelling: Google earns roughly $460 per user per year from advertising. If AI products could reach that level through ads, the US market alone could generate about $152 billion in annual revenue.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">OpenAI is already testing the waters: as of August 2026, its advertising business has reached an annualized revenue scale of $1 billion. Free and low-tier users see ads; high-tier subscribers enjoy an ad-free experience — the same tiered logic as streaming platforms.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fattachment\u002F20261007\u002Fb03bd696d4854eef86ebb03fbd9d3d3c.webp\" alt=\"img_02.webp\">\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>Three Groups in the AI Gold Rush\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Part of the crowd, believing \"free means no cost,\" is being quietly harvested.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">\u003Cstrong>The winners are the power users.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Someone spending $903 a month on a pile of AI tools is using them to replace outsourcing teams, compress labor costs, and multiply personal output. For them, AI is not consumption; it is investment.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">\u003Cstrong>The harvested are the free believers.\u003C\u002Fstrong> They trade data for convenience and attention for service. When conversations are used for model training, when ads penetrate every interaction, when free-tier models are progressively downgraded… they discover that the price of \"free\" is being commoditized. In the brutal internet age: if you don't pay for the product, you are the product.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">\u003Cstrong>The most awkward are the median payers.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Spending $25 a month on one or two AI tools, they have neither the power users' productivity returns nor the free users' zero cost — stuck in the middle, neither deep nor cheap.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>Conclusion: A Professional-Tool Market\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Looking back at the a16z list, one clear conclusion emerges: consumer AI today is essentially a professional-tool market. Its core users are developers, designers, content creators, and automation enthusiasts — people who can embed AI into workflows and generate real economic value with it.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">For them, paying tens to hundreds of dollars a month is rational, because AI earns back far more.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">But the ceiling of this market is also obvious: when subscription fees become a paywall that keeps the vast majority of ordinary users out, AI can only stay positioned as a \"professional tool.\"\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">The true mass AI era is not everyone paying for AI. It arrives when AI becomes as ordinary as water and electricity — when you no longer think about whether to renew this month, and no longer fear that the free tier will lose features again.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">That is when AI becomes a true mass celebration, and genuine mass adoption.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">The a16z report has already hinted at the direction: when traffic rankings and revenue rankings split so sharply — when 29 high-revenue products can't even make the traffic list — today's AI consumer market is far from \"for everyone.\" It is a highly efficient toolbox for a small group.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Only by crossing that paywall does AI's real world-changing era begin.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cfigure class=\"image\" style=\"display:table;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;clear:both\">\n \u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fattachment\u002F20261007\u002Fc60bfe9d5c8240a8b225b1ff99c4bc98.webp\" alt=\"img_01.webp\">\n\u003C\u002Ffigure>\n\u003Ch2 style=\"color:#111;font-size:21px;line-height:1.4;margin:28px 0 12px;\">\u003Cstrong>References\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fh2>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">a16z. \u003Ci>Top 100 Consumer AI Apps\u003C\u002Fi>, 7th edition (2026). First release pairing the traffic ranking with US consumer credit-card spending data.\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">RevenueCat. \u003Ci>2026 State of Subscription Apps\u003C\u002Fi> (trial-to-paid conversion 8.5%, annual retention 21.1% for AI apps).\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">Moore, O. (a16z). Commentary on the subscription model's ceiling and the advertising alternative (per-user Google ad revenue ≈$460\u002Fyear; US AI ad market potential ≈$152B).\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 18px;\">OpenAI advertising business: annualized revenue ≈$1B as of August 2026 (company-reported figure cited in the original source article).\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"color:#111;margin:28px 0 8px;\">\u003Cstrong>Related reading\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 20px;\">\u003Ca style=\"color:#111;text-decoration:none;\" href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fpoly-ai.chat\u002Farticle\u002Fold-phone-usb-drive\">\u003Cimg class=\"image_resized\" style=\"border-radius:8px;display:block;height:auto;margin-bottom:6px;max-width:520px;width:100%;\" src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.banyunjuhe.com\u002Fattachment\u002F20260926\u002Fbef4f923e5bd4fd3832e2a55127dc50e.png\" alt=\"Old Phone to USB Drive: How to Turn a Dead Phone's Chip Into…\">\u003C\u002Fa>\u003Cbr>\u003Ca style=\"color:#0b6cb0;text-decoration:none;\" href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fpoly-ai.chat\u002Farticle\u002Fold-phone-usb-drive\">\u003Cstrong>Old Phone to USB Drive: How to Turn a Dead Phone's Chip Into…\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 20px;\">\u003Ca style=\"color:#111;text-decoration:none;\" href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fpoly-ai.chat\u002Farticle\u002Ftrump-ai-rename-si\">\u003Cimg class=\"image_resized\" style=\"border-radius:8px;display:block;height:auto;margin-bottom:6px;max-width:520px;width:100%;\" src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.banyunjuhe.com\u002Fattachment\u002F20260926\u002F8f45a21516144def990f8f2ce7591b5f.png\" alt=\"Trump Wants to Rename AI to 'SI': Why 'Artificial' Makes Int…\">\u003C\u002Fa>\u003Cbr>\u003Ca style=\"color:#0b6cb0;text-decoration:none;\" href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fpoly-ai.chat\u002Farticle\u002Ftrump-ai-rename-si\">\u003Cstrong>Trump Wants to Rename AI to 'SI': Why 'Artificial' Makes Int…\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>\n\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 20px;\">\u003Ca style=\"color:#111;text-decoration:none;\" href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fpoly-ai.chat\u002Farticle\u002Finteractive-physics-encyclopedia\">\u003Cimg class=\"image_resized\" style=\"border-radius:8px;display:block;height:auto;margin-bottom:6px;max-width:520px;width:100%;\" src=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.banyunjuhe.com\u002Fattachment\u002F20260926\u002F5482547b287948779ab5f93b44820e6b.png\" alt=\"The One-Man Physics Encyclopedia That Beats a $20,000 Univer…\">\u003C\u002Fa>\u003Cbr>\u003Ca style=\"color:#0b6cb0;text-decoration:none;\" href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fpoly-ai.chat\u002Farticle\u002Finteractive-physics-encyclopedia\">\u003Cstrong>The One-Man Physics Encyclopedia That Beats a $20,000 Univer…\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fa>\u003C\u002Fp>","yunpoly, aipollo, mediasync-claw, AI consumer apps, AI subscription, AI monetization",true,"2026-10-08 14:05:56",94,12762,"zh_CN","ai-consumer-spending-who-pays-rfxn",false,"Science Guide Wwai","2026-10-07 20:16:00","Recently, the well-known venture firm a16z released the seventh edition of its Top 100 Consumer AI A...",18,"AI Consumer Spending: Only Power Users Pay | yunpoly","html",{"emailStatusOk":17,"statusLocked":17,"mobileStatusOk":17,"englishNickname":18,"nickname":18,"statusReg":17,"id":21,"created":25,"sourceString":26,"avatar":27,"url":28,"statusOk":17,"detailUrl":29,"username":30},"2025-12-29 12:22:32","","\u002Fstatic\u002Fcommons\u002Fimg\u002Favatar.png","\u002Fuser\u002F18","\u002Fadmin\u002Fuser\u002Fdetail\u002F18","panhb","normal",72,{"id":34,"slug":35,"title":36,"lang":37},12773,"tencent-oracle-lease-bwev","騰訊為什麼租甲骨文10萬顆AI晶片？","zh",{"prev":39,"next":43},{"id":40,"slug":41,"title":42,"categoryId":32},12772,"tencent-oracle-ai-chips-wzky","Tencent Rents 100,000 AI Chips From Oracle",{"id":44,"slug":45,"title":46,"categoryId":32},12664,"2f0b3c-ai-snake-romance-gender-debate","When the Fiancée Is a Snake: AI Anime Sparks Debate on Gender Roles and Absurd Romance",[48,50,51,53],{"id":40,"slug":41,"title":42,"thumbnail":49,"categoryId":32},"\u002Fattachment\u002F20261008\u002F20204afd78214fd88fc87f921a13756e.webp",{"id":14,"slug":16,"title":7,"thumbnail":6,"categoryId":32},{"id":44,"slug":45,"title":46,"thumbnail":52,"categoryId":32},"https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.banyunjuhe.com\u002Fattachment\u002F20260930\u002Fabd307865c604c1fa501ee8fe6cfff73.png",{"id":54,"slug":55,"title":56,"thumbnail":57,"categoryId":32},12662,"b86dc5-ai-scheming-doubao-debate","AI Auctions Spark Debate: Is 'Doubao' the Ultimate Schemer?","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.banyunjuhe.com\u002Fattachment\u002F20260930\u002Fcb0922ad05854444856a5e6ff36be9b5.png"]